Let's start with this premise: no matter what happens Sunday, it's going to be preposterous. Somebody's gonna get screwed. I think it will be Georgia.
I know I've said before that my personal belief is that a team that doesn't win its conference should not be able to play for the national championship. I still believe that. However, my personal belief matters not in this case. It's well within the provisions of the BCS system for such a team to play for the title, as Mark Richt continues to point out.
And here's the thing. Tell me who among the legitimate title game contenders is playing better than Georgia right now. The only team you can convince me on that point over Georgia is USC. And they're probably not getting in, either.
Among the other options:
* LSU? Yeah, they won the SEC, but they would have lost tonight if not for Erik Ainge pooping the bed in the fourth quarter. And they lost LAST WEEK AT HOME for goodness sakes.
* Virginia Tech? They lost by 41 points earlier this season. Yeah, they won the ACC but the ACC is a garbage conference. Plus their quarterback's Sean Glennon and I'd bet all my worldly possessions he throws at least two picks in the national title game.
* Oklahoma? Yeah, they beat Missouri twice, but I'm not sure that means as much as Bob Stoops might have you believe. Plus, they lost two weeks ago to unranked Texas Tech and gave up 473 yards in the process.
* Kansas? They also lost LAST WEEK. And let's be honest, they got fat and happy (yeah, that was a Mangino joke) on a pathetic non-conference schedule before squeaking their way through a soft league schedule full of mediocre Big 12 North teams.
* Ohio State? The only argument I have against them is that they lost two games ago. The Buckeyes' schedule isn't especially strong, but I feel like the Big 10 champs belong in the big game.
* USC? Might have blown its chances by losing to 4-8 Stanford, a 41-point underdog, in one of the biggest upsets in college football history. I think the Trojans are playing as well as or better than anybody right now, though.
* Hawaii? I couldn't even discuss this with a straight face. Let them be in the BCS and that's enough.
Here's the point. I don't think Georgia necessarily deserves to play in the national championship game, but who does? How can you possibly say X team deserves this opportunity over Y? It's completely subjective. This is why I can't understand why people allow this bastardized version of an otherwise great game to continue. You'll never convince me that whoever is eventually named the national champion is a legitimate champion or the absolutely-for-certain best team in the country, just as you couldn't convince me of that in 2004 or 2003 or 1997 or 1994 or 1993 or 1990. It's such a fascinating, great game and then it completely ruins itself with a horrible ending about every other year. It's like the end of The Sopranos. It's great the whole way through and it strings you along waiting for this great ending and then...plop, we're done, no true resolution. Some bowl fatcat might tell you that's what's great about college football, that it creates excitement and discussion. I call bullcrap on that. It's by far the worst thing about an otherwise great sport.
Sunday, December 02, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


7 comments:
Preach on, Brother Ching! Couldn't agree with you more.
Making it all worse is how the national sports neanderthals (ESPN is the worst) are all taking about UGA like it was a retarded stepchild. They don't care about Dawg fans or what the team could bring to the NC game. To them, this isn't about who is the best. This is all about the politics of profit...
Great analogy to the Sopranoe. And very true.
At least scout.com has us in the title game.
Dave: That's a terrific analysis. I admit my Dawg bias, but there are (as you point out) equally compelling arguments to keep out ALL other eligible teams. ESPN's self-serving drum beating on this is unbearable. The "Sopranos" analogy is good, but the BCS is much worse. At least David Chase had an artistic vision and made his endgame choice based on that. No way he would have allowed corporate suits or public opinion to sway his "black-out screen" choice. The BCS knuckleheads and poll voters will change their loves and hates at 8pm tonight based wholly on network talking heads, corporate bowl sponsors, and bowl officials. That's not just frustrating, it's spineless.
Looks like UGA gets screwed. We're still ranked 4th in today's Coaches Poll. LSU & Oklahoma leapfrogged us.
It is unfortnate for Georgia to get screwed because the mass-media is saying "it can't happen like that for a team that didn't win its conference with 2 losses to get in." Actually the BCS is PERFECTLY designed for shenanigans just like that to happen. I am a Georgia fan but I kind of agree that non-conference champions probably shouldn't be in the title game, but since the BCS and title game is a sham, why the F not? Happened for Nebraska in 2001 (lost their last game, finished 3rd in their conference, got into National Champ Game).
Post a Comment